First- let me apologize for the length of this passage. I couldn't find a suitable way to break it into 2 posts. Second, I would much appreciate your comments on these thoughts of Rollins'.
"...if a Christian is sharing his or her faith, the discussion will likely concern a set of beliefs that one is asked to accept--beliefs that will often include the existence of God, the deity of Christ, the existence of sin, and the atoning sacrifice of Jesus. If these are accepted then the individual will be asked to engage in certain behavior, that is, to pray, repent, and join the local church. Then, once this has taken place, that individual will be welcomed into the Christian community, being invited to get involved in the life of the church."
"This approach works with the underlying idea that belief is of prime importance in Christianity, followed by behavior, followed by belonging. In contrast to this let us briefly consider the birth of an infant. When a child enters the world she does not begin with a system of beliefs that must be accepted before she belongs to the family. The infant, in a healthy environment, begins her life with absolute unconditional acceptance. The infant belongs to the family as the family now belongs to the infant. As the child grows she gradually learn to engage in the various rituals in which the family engages. These will include times when the family members eat together, play together, relax together, and so on. Then the child will begin to form a set of beliefs about the world into which she is already embedded. these will generally begin by mimicking the beliefs of the parents. Then these beliefs will likely come into conflict with hose of the parents, as she attempt to wrestle with the world for herself and test limits. And finally she will often come into some equitable relationship with the parents' beliefs, agreeing with some and disagreeing with others. Within a healthy, loving family each of these stages will be welcomed and allowed room to breathe."
"This approach thus places belonging first, followed by behavior, followed last and least, by belief. This model is what we find in operation within a broadly Hebraic approach to faith, and approach that emphasizes belonging to the community and engaging in the shared rituals of the community... What is important is that, regardless of the doubts and beliefs we have, we know that we have a vital place in the community and are encouraged to remain involved in the traditions--traditions that, at their best, provide ample space for doubt, ambiguity, and uncertainty."
For an interesting parallel observation, see Tony Jones' post Is Virtual Community True Community?.
9 comments:
"... if a Christian is sharing his or her faith, the discussion will likely concern a set of beliefs that one is asked to accept ... If these are accepted then the individual will be asked to engage in certain behavior ... Then, once this has taken place, that individual will be welcomed into the Christian community, being invited to get involved in the life of the church..."
The problem with this "order" is that you can not possibly know what you are really supposed to believe until you have been there for a while. Being part of a community teaches you to believe (or not believe), over time. It's the same with the expectations of behaviour. People "sign up" and then later find out that the expectations seem to change...
Just another example of how we do things backwards. As usual.
The obvious drawback of putting beliefs first is that then certain beliefs (or certain ways of talking about them) become the litmus test for who really belongs in the community, and pretty soon you have gatekeepers and people arguing the finer points of where to draw the lines. By which point the people you were hoping to draw into community have pretty much lost interest...
My husband and I ran an Alpha course for several years, and tried to embody this principle of belonging before believing. It was a challenge to train ourselves and our small group leaders to hold back on offering the "right" answers, and allow our guests to flail around with their beliefs long enough to feel welcomed into our community. There is a real change of mindset and culture required to make this shift, but it's one the church needs to make.
hey rainer. I agree that we do a lot of things backwards!
I think what I've most often seen is similar to this, but a little more akin to "bait and switch." Sort of, "you're welcome here just as you are," but then as soon as the person "steps inside the circle" they're expected to conform to things they may or may not agree with.
Maria- it's exactly the idea of the litmus test that so offends me. And the church does it all the time. To the extent that I rarely say what I really think in church. It's just not okay to question, or suggest anything other than the "typical" evangelical answer to everything.
Like i said to Rainer, i see it more after the fact, which may be even less honest than the other way around!
How many times did Jesus use a verb that could be restated with "just do x" vs. "just say x"? I would bet the former far outweighs the latter. Yet we all think Christianity is best served and propagated by talking at someone, not loving at them.
I'm just sayin'. :o)
jim-
you are so right! keep sayin' it.
I always find this strife so confusing & upsetting. Being an Orthodox Christian all my life, I have trouble relating to the extremes of fundamentalist Christianity or sometime some evangalical churches. I wanted to comment though, because I feel like this post IS how I lived in the Church and how I became a Christian. (which seems so different from everyone else commenting)
The Orthodox Church baptizes and chrismates babies at 8 weeks old. They also give communion every Sunday therafter to the baby. Now-no 8 week old baby can accept a "set of beliefs" or chose to "Join" a church. The parents and church community simply accept the baby as he or she is and the child is accepted to the church on behalf of the beliefs of his/her parents. Over time, that child will grow, question, and hash out their beliefs (not only with their parents, but with the church tenents). At some point, said teen/adult will need to decide to begin believing on their own. Not because their parents say so, not because the church says so, but because they have decided on a path of faith on their own. This sounds an awful lot like what the post was hoping for.
I can see if people "signup" and then later find out that the expectations seem to change....that would be difficult. Perhaps my comfort is two-fold. First, I never "signed-up" for a faith. I was simply born into the Orthodox Church and have chosen to stay there. Secondly, not much changes between Orthodox Churches. The Liturgy is not only the same in all the US, but in any language overseas( Russian, Ukranian, Greek, Ethiopian, Japanese, etc.) So, no matter where I go, I will never be blindsighted by changing expectations, tenents, beliefs, ....The routine and consitency (sp?) keep me grounded and anxiety free at services and in life.
I wish all of you the best and hope that you find a comfort zone within Christianity that brings you joy and restfulness.
Cheryl
Cheryl-
thanks so much for adding your observations from the Orthodox perspective. It's good to hear that you find the notion of belief before belonging foreign! Sometimes, while swimming (drowning) in a sea of protestant evangelicals, one can forget there are other seas. The Protestant Church could - and should- learn a lot from our Orthodox brothers and sisters.
Interesting blog as for me. It would be great to read something more about this theme.
BTW look at the design I've made myself London escort
Post a Comment